LP
National · 50 states + DC

Lao Americans in the United States

The first national, open-data portal making the Lao-American community visible in federal and state statistics. The U.S. Census counts 51,665 people of Lao ancestry (ACS 2022, Table B04006) — a well-documented undercount of a community that researchers and community organizations estimate at ~200,000–270,000. Live Census data for every state, deep community-partnered dashboards for our featured states, and an AI research platform built with — not just about — the Lao diaspora.

51,665
Lao Americans (ACS)
51
States + DC
7
Featured states

Every state. Every Lao community.

Scope: National · ACS 2022

Click any state to open its Census snapshot. Featured states have a deeper community-partnered dashboard with narratives, predictive models, and local survey data — additional states join as community partnerships form.

Loading interactive US map…
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates (2022), Table B04006 (Lao ancestry, alone or in combination). Hover for details, click to open a state.Default view: lower 48 — pan/zoom to see Alaska & Hawaii.

Featured community states

Community-partnership tier · not raw count

These 7 states host community-partnered research, narratives, and predictive models built in collaboration with local Lao organizations.

Note on selection: featured states reflect active community partnerships, not raw Census rankings. Utah (#3) and North Dakota (#5) rank highly by ACS population but partnerships there are still forming.

Featured research · Minnesota

Aggregated "Asian" category rates

Disparities are hidden when Lao data is grouped under "Asian."

Gambling Addiction
8%
Linguistic Isolation
15%
Poverty Rate
12%
Elder No Schooling
10%
No Regular Provider
15%
0%10%20%30%40%50%

Source: MN Community Survey 2024, Census ACS 5-yr estimates

Lao People Data & Research · Featured Minnesota dataset

AI Pipeline — Live

6 sources (Census ACS, BLS, BRFSS, Community Survey)

36,371 processed

From Reactive to Predictive

Before: Reactive Crisis Response

Data lag:6-18 months

Between data collection and policy response

Aggregation:"Asian"

Lao disparities hidden under pan-ethnic category

Interventions:Generic

One-size-fits-all across all Asian communities

Detection:After crisis

Problems identified only after they escalate

After: Predictive & Proactive

Data freshness:Real-time

Continuous monitoring of 6 data sources + community narratives

Disaggregation:Lao-specific

First AI-powered portal built specifically for a refugee community

Interventions:Culturally-targeted

ML-recommended, community-informed, temple-based delivery

Detection:Before crisis

Early warning system predicts risk weeks before threshold breach

Why Data Disaggregation Matters

The U.S. Census reports roughly 51,665 people of Lao ancestry across all 50 states and DC (ACS 5-Year, Table B04006). Community researchers and Lao-American organizations consistently estimate the true community size at ~200,000–270,000, once multi-ancestry households, refugee resettlement records, and culturally-Lao residents who report as “Asian” or “Other” on the census are included. Either way, these are descendants of refugees from the Secret War (1964–1975) and their second- and third-generation children — and in nearly every federal and state data system, they are categorized simply as “Asian,” a category that lumps populations with vastly different refugee histories, socioeconomic profiles, health outcomes, and educational attainment into a single statistical bucket.

This aggregation creates a statistical illusion. The “Asian” category, buoyed by high-income East Asian and South Asian populations, masks severe disparities. In Minnesota — the deepest community-partnered dataset in this portal — disaggregated research shows a gambling addiction rate 4.8× the state average, linguistic isolation at 34.8% (vs. 4.5% statewide), and 45.3% of elders with no formal schooling. We expect comparable hidden disparities in every state hosting a Lao community.

This portal uses AI-powered analysis, federal data integration (Census ACS, BLS, FRED, BEA), and community-governed research to make these hidden disparities visible — and actionable. Featured states (California, Washington, Utah, Minnesota, Texas, Arizona, Tennessee) host deeper community-partnered work; the remaining 43 states have live Census snapshots and will join the deeper tier as community partnerships form.

Source: Census ACS 2020-2024 (Table B04006, Lao ancestry), MDH BRFSS, Community Survey 2025 · Lao People Data & Research

Methodology & Rigor

Every prediction, visualization, and recommendation is built on transparent, reproducible methods that meet peer-review standards.

{}

SHAP Explainability

Every prediction includes feature attribution scores — no black boxes

Fairness Auditing

Disparate impact ratio, demographic parity tested on every model run

⟨⟩

Confidence Intervals

95% CI reported for all estimates. P-values and effect sizes disclosed

Model Cards

Standardized documentation: training data, limitations, intended use

Peer-Reviewed Methods
Open Source
Community IRB
FAIR Data
0ML Models
0Predictions
0Indicators
0Data Sources

Stay informed

Receive data updates, policy briefs, and community insights from the Lao Community Data Portal. All analysis is free, open-access, and community-governed.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time. Community data delivered monthly.